Referendum on pension forfeiture is essential
to cleaning up state government
Yes, there is an election this fall.
Several local offices are up for grabs, including Syracuse mayor.
But there will also be one incredibly crucial thing on the ballot — a state referendum that demands the special attention of all New Yorkers. We will decide whether state officials who have been convicted of public corruption can be stripped of their pensions.
Current rules only allow for such action with those who joined the retirement system after 2011, but this referendum would make it apply to anyone currently serving in government.
Former State Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver and Senate Majority Leader Dean Skelos, who were both convicted in 2015 of corruption and have yet to begin their prison sentences, are both poised to receive $79,224 and $95,832 a year respectively in annual pensions while behind bars.
Will you ever see a pension like that? As a law-abiding citizen?
Oh and by the way, you’re paying for it. As of last year, $682,000 a year in taxpayer money goes to 16 former state lawmakers who have been convicted of a felony and have since filed for their retirement, according to a Gannett analysis of data from the state Comptroller’s Office.
That alone should be enough reason to go the polls and vote “yes” on the referendum. But in case it isn’t…
Silver and Skelos’ convictions were indeed momentous, but they were merely the pinnacle of a streak of state corruption in recent years. More than 30 current or former state lawmakers have been accused or convicted of illegal activities since 2000, ranging from corruption and bribery to burglary and DWI. Just weeks ago, we came across the 40th.
State Sen. Robert Ortt, of Niagara County, was charged at the end of March with violating election law, alleging that he arranged a no-show job for his wife to offset his salary, for which she pocketed over $21,000 over four years. Ortt’s predecessor, former Sen. George Maziarz, was also charged with using campaign money to pay an ex-staffer accused of sexual harassment. Both have pleaded not guilty.
We have grown numb when news breaks of another state official’s indictment. Unfortunately, our government has too. There used to be at least some noise from legislators about a need for ethics reform — mainly convenient talking points during an election year. But following Ortt’s arrest, there’s been barely a peep. Heck, Senate Majority Leader John Flanagan hardly seemed phased about it.
“I’m going to continue to work with Rob,” he told reporters. “I’m sure he’s going to be back here tomorrow.”
Now it’s true, Ortt is innocent until proven guilty, but his situation is just another reason the Legislature needs to pass concrete ethics reform. Yet it’s also just another case the Legislature will ignore. If the convictions of Silver and Skelos, the second and third most powerful men in the state, weren’t enough to convince lawmakers otherwise, why would the arrest of a one-term legislator from western New York be any different?
According to Flanagan, “in the last five or six years there’s been very, very significant ethics reforms in the state of New York in ways that people don’t even realize yet.”
Mr. Flanagan seems to think that state officials being arrested, convicted and jailed one after the other is the result of “very significant ethics reform.”
For his part, Gov. Andrew Cuomo, whose own aides have been tainted with corruption charges, makes a lot of noise about his plans for ethics reform in his executive budget every January, but then remains almost silent on it afterward.
He did so again this past January, proposing measures that are completely sound, like putting restrictions on outside income for lawmakers, initiating term limits and closing the LLC loophole, which allows big donors and special interests to circumvent the state’s campaign finance limits and funnel millions of dollars to the candidates of their choice.
Even though he has significant power leverage when negotiating the budget with the Legislature, Cuomo continues to put ethics on the back burner in exchange for other priorities. This time, he is more concerned with ending the state’s policy of trying 16-and 17-year old defendants in adult courtrooms.
Last year, when significant ethics reform wasn’t included in the budget, we were promised that it would come before the legislative session ended in June. It didn’t. There’s little reason to believe this year will be any different.
This is why you need to vote in November. It is now painfully clear that when it comes to something as simple as weeding out dirty politics in Albany, our government is more or less incapable of implementing thorough solutions.
They were, however, able to twice pass a resolution that now puts the issue in our hands.
The referendum on pension forfeiture provides us the opportunity to go where our legislators won’t. It finally gives us a chance to take action on an issue we have wanted for a long time.
It’s passage sounds like a no-brainer, but unfortunately we are very good at disappointing ourselves. Despite all our frustrations with those in Albany and our constant talk of the need to “clean house,” almost all incumbents won re-election last fall. In 2004, Roger Green, an assemblyman from Brooklyn, pleaded guilty to petty larceny in connection with filing false claims for travel reimbursement and was sentenced to three years of probation. Then he ran for re-election — and won. In 2014, the late Sen. Thomas Libous from Binghamton was indicted and later convicted for lying to the FBI about how he arranged a cushy job for his son, then ran for re-election — and won. Voting “no” on the pension forfeiture referendum this year, or not voting at all, would be the equivalent of such a mistake. Let’s not take this opportunity and blow it.
Of course, the referendum isn’t the perfect remedy. More proactive measures like closing the LLC loophole will help prevent corruption, whereas this resolution only helps us deal with it after it happens. But it’s an enormous step in the right direction. All it needs is our approval.
If you need any more convincing, listen to what this legislator thinks about pension forfeiture as part of ethics reform.
“This has to be a part of it. All these plans should be a part of it, but the pension forfeiture piece specifically, I think it’s something that the public demands at this point.”
Those words were spoken a year ago by none other than Sen. Robert Ortt. Yes, the one mentioned above who is currently facing corruption charges.
We wouldn’t want to disappoint him. So go vote this fall. Vote to keep hard-earned money for a well-worked career out of the pockets of those who deserve neither. If this referendum fails, Albany will continue full speed as business as usual. And this time, we’ll have no one to blame but ourselves.
Luke Parsnow is the Monday Editor and daily copy editor/page designer at The Post-Star, a Pulitzer-Prize winning daily publication located in Glens Falls, New York. You can follow his blog “Things That Matter” by clicking “Follow” below and follow his updates on Twitter at https://twitter.com/coolhand_luke88